COMM610 F10/Class notes
From Driscollwiki
Media effects doctoral seminar
- Sandra J. Ball-Rokeach
Contents |
Aug 24
- "Tiger ladies"
- Women successful in SBRs experience of 60s aca fields
- Stereotype of lacking collegiality
Homework
1para each, email to SBR:
- What is the nature of human nature?
- What is the proper social order?
- Is equality possible?
Direct effect models
- WWII era
- Using movies, and other entertainment media to inculcate soldiers with anti-German feelings
- Early days of behaviorism
- Pavlov, operant conditioning
- Conception of human nature based on universal "drives"
- Message is unfiltered
- "Magic bullet"
- "Hypodermic needle"
Mass society
- Homogeneous
- Individuals are anonymous to each other
- K. Genevieve case, complete privatization, individuation
- Nothing exists but for the "I"
- In "traditional societies", people speak of "we"
- Modern society provides a breaking point for "I" from "We"
- Only thing that people share is the media
- Media is all-powerful, only filter on the "I"
Durkheim
- People need allegiances to groups and society "as a whole"
- Social system made up of many parts
- Study requires engaging with interacting parts
- Not enough to look at one part alone
Katz, Lazersfeld
- Laz working at Columbia.edu
- Later accused of doing "Administrative research", research for the benefit of the wealthy, powerful
- Did not believe that it was a "mass society"
- Classic studies in political campaigns
- Peoples Choice, best methodology for its time on studying political campaigns
- Laid foundation for "2-step flow" model
"Opinion leaders"
- Different interests within a group
- Individuals become experts of a kind on various topics
- Take on a kind of knowledge labor for the group
- Filtering
- Each interpersonal group reconstructs the media "message" in its own image via selectivity processes
Selectivity processes
- Exposure, choosing which and how much media
- Perception, different perception based on norms, values, needs, interests, attitudes
- Retention
2 step flow
- Message is sent
- Received by opinion leader
- Opinion leader reshapes the message
- Opinion leader re-transmits the message to the group
"Weak effects model"
"Conservative" theory
- Group is entirely in charge of the message
- Message reconstructed to conform to what the group already believes
- Power of media to bring about change is "little, if any"
2 step flow today
- Remains the dominant model
- Katz Personal influence is still in print

