Mama's baby, papa's maybe

From Driscollwiki

Jump to: navigation, search


Stillers, H. (2003) "8. Mama's baby, papa's maybe: An american grammar book." Black, white, and in color: essays on American literature and culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Reflecting on the names a black woman may be called in public:

  • "Brown sugar", "sapphire", "granny", "aunty", etc.
  • "overdetermined nominative properties" (203)
  • "markers so loaded with mythical prepossession" the marked can't "come clean" (203)

Contents

Bastard status

In a society where inheritance is according to the male/father,

  • No possibility (need?) for a female bastard concept

Referring to Moynihan's 60s report on the American family

  • Assertion that the AfAm family lacks a father and thus is decentered
    • Yet somehow blames this on mother and daughter?
  • Stiller: daughters and fathers manifest the same "rhetorical symptoms of absence and denial" (204)
    • In a system of domination, the gender holds no "symbolic integrity"
    • Worth working out these conflated roles because understanding them might return power to both male and female via
    • The opportunity, possibility for gender differentiation (not determined.) (204)
  • Identifies "underachieving" black males among overachieving females. (205)
    • Suggests that this arrangement is incompatible with the patriarchical dominant (white?) culture

Ethnicity and the Moynihan report

  • Ethnicity used as a category "out of time" (205)
    • "white family", "Negro family" are "wholly generated with neither past nor future [...] pure present and always tense" (205)
  • Ethnicity achieves "memorial time", eternal (via Barthes and the dynamics of myth)

Gender effects of enslavement

Violent theft of the body (206)

  • Loss of gender difference (among other subjective distinctions)
  • Externally imposed meanings resulting in a dispersed "powerlessness" (not limited to physical power) (206)

"Body" and "flesh"

Flesh precedes the body

  • "zero degree of social conceptualization that does not escape concealment under the brush of discourse or the reflexes of iconography" (206)
  • Narratives grounded in the "flesh" of enslaved people concerns actual ripping, tearing, binding
  • Human tissue "altered" and "ruptured", tortured (207)
  • Can these flesh-bound marks and brands be carried forward in "symbolic substitution" to future generations? (207)

Female flesh "ungendered" by violence and attack (207)

  • Not only the site of rape (in many forms) but forms of torture and violence typically gendered and thought of as "male"/"male"

Use of enslaved people in medicine

  • "Diseased, damaged, disabled" people used for research, experimentation (208)
  • "Total objectification" as bodies are categorized according to diseased parts (e.g., liver or kidney)

Captive flesh/body, though apparently liberated (208)

  • Remains coded, named, subject to the metaphors and discourses of captivity
  • Despite historiographic, theoretical, and forgetful energies opposed

American grammar

Symbolic order

  • Beginning with violent, large-scale demographic changes in sub-Saharan Africa as a result of slavery
  • Interrupting centuries of African culture
  • "Every writing makes the the [startling] discovery [of pain] all over again" (209)

Narratives of African people

  • Mutual shock in a meeting of European and African people
  • Immediate "fall", "loss of communication", "loss of communicative force" (209)
  • "Astonishing", alien customs, behaviors, sounds, appearances (210)
  • Captors researve the right and ability to name, rename, and "name" the captive
    • Reflected in the continued unwelcome naming indicated at the start

European explorers

  • "Discovery" of African people
  • Blunt understanding of variation among the darker-skinned people
  • Surprising imprecision given their savvy with navigation tools and techne (211)

"Males looking at other males" (212)

  • Females apparently already estranged
  • Appearance not dictate of the Church but emergent from explorer narratives
    • "Fair" opposed by "ugly", "hideous"
    • "Ugly" accompanied by "pagan"
  • Indicators of "bestial" nature are ersatz, "specular"
    • Absence, unfamiliarity with "bread" or "wine" or "houses",
    • Despite the presence of sophisticated cuisine (213)

Middle passage

African people, isolated, separated from family

  • Crammed into hulls
  • An arrangement that "contravenes notions of the domestic" (214)
  • "Suspended" in the ocean, "nowhere", with no knowledge of their location on the Earth (215)
  • Becoming "culturally unmade" (215)

Male and female

  • Differentiated only according to size, mass
  • Fed the same, treated the same
  • Gender differences quantified but not culture
  • Records of female violation, insurrection, anger (in some cases presence!) not recorded in letters or other artifacts
    • Lacking in either evidence or counter-evidence
    • Yet anecdotes, reports of pre-slavery, suggest that in many African communities the female was strong and would not likely have submitted easily... ? (216)

Absence of female activity from these accounts

  • Unrecognizable according to a patriarchical frame
  • Purposefully left absent, obscured

Property + kinlessness

Economic situation that relies on a rupture of conventional kinship (217)

  • Children neither "belong" to mother nor are "related" to "owners".
    • Automatically, by default, they are orphaned at birth
  • Vestibular cultural formation whereby property relations can "invade" kinship at any moment (218)

Family structures emerging among enslaved people

  • Tend away from vertical, blood-line structures familiar to the West
  • Instead forming along horizontal relationships: language, discourse, blood, naming according to legal arrangements of slavery
  • That captive people were able to form strong bonds amid the violence and instability of capitivity is "startling" to recall or consider (219)
  • Though the very word "family" and the "nuclear family" is constructed of culture, history, law, and economics
    • Expecting patriarchical formation and patrimonial transference of wealth

How does kinship undermine the profitability of enslavement?

  • If the parent is to believe she has a human right to the child, the sense of dehumanized property is undermined (220)

Loss of mother, loss of sibling bonds?

  • Douglass' recollection of life among brothers and sisters, absent mother
  • "Could we say, then, that the feeling of kinship is not inevitable?" (220)
  • Destructive loss of mother and the attendent biological certainty of birth
    • Leads enslaved young to "social ambiguity" and "chaos"
    • But is this true of adopted children generally? Especially those estranged from birth parents?

Unidentified "master" father and identified "slave" mother

  • "Fatherhood, at best a supreme cultural courtesy" (221)
  • "One has been 'made' and 'bought' by disparate currencies, linking back to a common origin of exchange and domination"
  • Inquiry into identity of father is met with reminder of ownership and property-status

"Pleasure" amid enslavement?

  • All customary aspects of sexuality: "reproduction, motherhood, pleasure, desire" all "thrown into crisis" (221)
  • Dubious among all couplings: between owner/owned as well as among the captive

Relationships among women, free and enslaved

  • Neither fully owning claim to her body
  • Jealousy of the free wife toward the young captive women
  • Also a desire to occupy the younger body

Slavery and law

Slave owner is positively compelled to treat the enslaved as property

  • Rather than restricted from treating them as human

Law in 1705

  • Removes "blacks from the family of man" (222)
  • As well lists them along a variety of possessible entities, living and inanimate
  • How and why is this discursively possible?
  • What can and could be done to disrupt it?

Uniqueness of the African-American male

Matriarchy among Af Am families is misunderstood

  • The mother was denied even the right to motherhood
  • As well as any legal right to guide inheritance, naming

Enslavement removed from the male

  • The conventional partner responsibilities of naming, inheritance

The male may regain power and personhood through the only available path:

  • Of female, of mother? (228)

Amid enslavement:

  • Motherhood, "as female bloodrite is outraged, is denied, at the very same time that it becomes the founding term of a human and social enactment" (228)
  • Fatherhood, "dual fatherhood is set in motion, comprised of the African father's banished name and body and the captor father's mocking presence."
  • Only the female stands in the flesh (228)
    • But she is outside the "traditional symbolics of female gender", a "different social subject" (228)

By claiming this "different" status ("with the potential to "name""), might the African-American female rewrite a "radically different text for female empowerment?" (229)

Personal tools