SABLE v. FCC, No. 88-515, 1989
From Driscollwiki
Contents |
Sable Communications of Cal, Inc. v. FCC
- Appeal from the US District Court for the Central District of CA
- No. 88-515
- June 23, 1989
Who wrote it?
- Justice White
Facts
- Sable sells pre-recorded porn messages
- Comm Act of 1934 was amended based on several years of FCC regulation
Legally important facts
- Sable argues that it is in a "double bind" and that the amendment means they are held to a "national" community standard
- Least tolerant community will blanket all
Prior procedural posture
- District Court concluded that govt has a legit interest in protecting kids from dial-a-porn
- But 223(b) was not sufficiently narrowly tailored
Issue to be decided
- Constitutionality of 223(b) of the Communications Act of 1934
- Imposes an outright ban on indecent as well as obscene interstate commercial phone msgs (since 1988 amendment)
Law that applies
Court's holding
- Prohibition on on obscene dial-a-porn is constitutional
- Sable can tailor its messages according to the communities it serves
- But prohibition on indecent dial-a-porn is a violation

